A drone strike is an aerial attack using weaponized unmanned commercial aerial vehicles. As of 2019, the United States has several operational UCAVs in its arsenal. These aircraft are used by military forces as an alternative to human armed forces. These drones can carry out a wide range of missions, such as monitoring and locating targets.
A survey conducted on the subject found that French and American citizens had different attitudes towards the legitimacy of drone strikes. They were more likely to register a strike as legitimate if it was conducted by their country than a foreign one. Furthermore, Americans are more likely to associate national superiority with their preferred strikes, compared to French citizens.
Although a drone strike may kill an enemy, it is not uncommon for civilians to be killed. The question of who should be killed by drones is often a sensitive one. However, there are some restrictions on what is considered an acceptable level of leeway. Some countries have a legal framework that limits the use of drones and limits their use to combating terrorists.
The United States has said it carried out the strike by a drone while al-Zawahiri was on a balcony. However, the government hasn’t yet revealed where the drone was launched from. But it’s not hard to assume that it flew a great distance before hitting its target. John Kirby, the coordinator of strategic communications for the White House’s National Security Council, said the drone strike “deals a significant blow to al-Qaida’s operations in Afghanistan.”
Despite the resulting controversy, the U.S. continues to conduct a review of its use of force policies. In particular, it is important to consider how civilians are affected by drone strikes. As a result, the Biden administration must make civilians’ safety a priority. In addition to ensuring the safety of civilians, the government must stop these lethal strikes outside the defined battlefield.
A drone strike carried out by the United States on the outskirts of Afghanistan killed a leader of al-Qaeda. The strike has political and substantive implications for the administration. The death of an al-Qaeda leader is a significant blow to the U.S. counterterrorism strategy, but the U.S. government should not forget that civilians were killed as part of the attack.
While it is important to acknowledge the costs of drone strikes, a drone strike is only as effective as the information that guides it. In addition, drones heavily rely on intelligence and local military cooperation. This raises questions about the legitimacy of such strikes and their net utility. Further, American officials often characterize these strikes as righteous or legitimate.
The United States and Pakistan should develop mechanisms for investigating civilian drone harm. They should also make compensation available to victims of drone strikes.